Incidents occur every year in Norway’s petroleum industry which could have developed into a major accident under only slightly different circumstances. A clarification of the risk concept in the regulations could help to reduce these events.
A report from Norway’s Auditor General criticises several aspects of the way health, safety and the environment (HSE) in the Norwegian oil and gas industry is followed up by the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA). Also presenting proposals for improving and strengthening the PSA’s role, the report is generally supportive of today’s petroleum safety regime.
We have given Equinor consent to drill exploration well 6507/3-13 in production licence 159B in the Norwegian Sea.
The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA) and the Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority have jointly audited Maersk Drilling's routines for handling notifications of censurable conditions (whistleblowing) at work.
On 20 November 2018 we performed a verification of Aker BP’s planning and execution of permanent plugging of wells at Valhall DP.
We have carried out an audit of Vår Energi focused on management of the working environment and materials handling on the Balder field.
The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA) is currently working to learn more about which of its supervisory activities have the greatest effect, and to increase awareness about which approaches give the best return.
A user survey has been conducted by the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA) to learn more about how its audits are perceived by the industry and the effect they have, and to identify potential improvements. The results are now available.
On commission from the PSA, Lloyd's Register has undertaken a study to shed light on the risk picture associated with different vessel operations in the petroleum activities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.
The Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA) and the Norwegian Labour Inspection Authority have jointly audited Transocean’s routines for handling notifications of censurable conditions (whistleblowing) at work.
Following up the petroleum industry’s work with digital technology and ICT security is a priority area at the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA). A key target for this supervision in 2019 will be helping the sector to improve safety and the working environment.
Two questions concern us above all others:
Identifying risk, with an associated understanding of possible accident scenarios and consequences, represents the basis for all safety work.
Understanding risk is necessary in order to
Risk is not a static and innate characteristic of a given activity, which cannot be influenced. It develops over time in step with such aspects as
As a decision support tool, risk analyses form part of the basis for managing risk. Risk analyses and studies seek to obtain the greatest possible insight into the enterprise, including the identification of knowledge gaps.
The aim is to understand how hazards can arise and develop in order to implement the most appropriate measures where they can be most effective in
Risk analyses must necessarily build on some assumptions and assessments, which are based to a varying degree on experience, knowledge, scientific methods and expectations of the future.
An understanding of the basis on which such analyses build and the limitations they incorporate is accordingly crucial.
The analyst must accordingly clarify what they know and do not know, what is history and what assessments of the future, and what opportunities are available for influencing operations so that they can be conducted in an acceptable manner.
Nor must the results or figures generated by risk analyses overshadow the point of conducting them: to obtain the knowledge need to control risk in each activity.
A risk analysis process enhances risk understanding in order to implement risk-reduction measures.
What is risk?
The traditional way of describing risk in an analytic context is as probability times consequences, calculated through various risk values or categories.
In certain contexts, moreover, it can be appropriate to compare risks in order to acquire a perspective on their comparative importance in an activity.
But this approach to defining risk is too narrow and limiting for the ability to understand, administer and manage activities and enterprises.
On that basis, risk can be defined as the consequences of an activity with the associated uncertainty.
Quantitative or qualitative analyses, assessments or comments retailed to this uncertainty, and thereby the risk, must always be viewed in relation to who is conducting the analysis. Uncertainty is somebody’s uncertainty about what the consequences will be.